This content was automatically translated from the original language. The original content is available by clicking the link below.
MŠ odpovídá na dopis z 8. 6.: 1. BM si přečetl rukopis jeho knihy v roce 1958, řekl mu své připomínky, na základě kterých MŠ knihu doplnil nebo přepracoval. Po druhém čtení BM vyjádřil svůj souhlas. 2. Neví nic o dopisech mezi BM a Rosalie Barstow. 3. BM mu v dopise z 11. 7. 1958 sdělil, že si opsal systematický katalog z rukopisu jeho knihy. Cítil se být poctěn, ale jeho nakladatel měl už na tento katalóg copyright. Prosil, aby ho nedal někomu, kdo by toho mohl zneužít - v dopise ze 7. 9. 1958 ho BM uklidnil. Nyní se ale dověděl, že H. Halbreich hodlá v Paříži vydat katalog Martinů děl, který je zjevně ovlyvněn jeho (MŠ) prací. Proto požádal ChM, aby mu napsala, co se stalo s oným přepsaným katalogem. Dodnes nedostal odpověď. 4. Uvítá všechny seriózní informace a dokumenty, nestojí o nepodložené fámy.
Show AI translation
MS replies to the letter of 8 June: 1. BM read the manuscript of his book in 1958, told him his comments, on the basis of which MS added to or revised the book. After a second reading, BM expressed his approval. 2. He knows nothing of the letters between BM and Rosalie Barstow. 3. BM told him in a letter dated 11/7/1958 that he had copied a systematic catalogue from the manuscript of his book. He felt honoured, but his publisher already had the copyright on this catalogue. He begged not to give it to someone who might misuse it - BM reassured him in his letter of 7 September 1958. Now, however, he learned that H. Halbreich intended to publish a catalogue of Martinů's works in Paris, which was obviously influenced by his (BM's) work. He therefore asked ChM to write to him about what had happened to the rewritten catalogue. To this day he has not received a reply. 4. He welcomes all serious information and documents, he is not interested in unsubstantiated rumours.
Show original